Cases 21 - 30 of 32
BERRY, II v. FLAT ROCK, CITY OF et al
as 2:2012cv11744
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROGER BERRY, II
Defendant:
FLAT ROCK, CITY OF , FLAT ROCK POLICE DEPT. , WILLIAM SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandles v. Chastang et al
as 2:2012cv11721
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Rita Chastang , Sarah Cohen , George Steeh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. King et al
as 1:2011cv11135
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones and Vicki Jones
Defendant:
Roger E. King and Worldwide Dedicated Services, Inc
Dawson et al v. Mt. Brighton, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv10233
Plaintiff:
Corinne Dawson , Peter Miles , Justine Miles and others
Defendant:
Mt. Brighton, Inc. , Roger Sturgis and Robert Sturgis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bulkley et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2010cv12608
Plaintiff:
Roger Bulkley and Sharon Ann Bulkley
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reitenga v. Zimmer US, Incorporated et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv12581
Plaintiff:
Roger Reitenga
Defendant:
Zimmer US, Incorporated and zimmer holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarvis v. Eaton et al
as 1:2008cv14221
Plaintiff:
John Jarvis
Defendant:
Lawrence Eaton, Trevor DeMoines, Roger Sabins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gjolaj v. Bare et al
as 2:2008cv13871
Plaintiff:
Lena Gjolaj
Defendant:
Roger W Bare and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rogers v. Homegoods, Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv15385
Plaintiff:
Susan F Rogers
Defendant:
Homegoods, Incorporated and TJX Companies, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Williams v. Romulus Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv14358
Plaintiff:
Lorna Williams
Defendant:
Romulus Police Department, Roger Salwa, Kline and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
