Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Bou-Assaly et al v. George P. Mann & Associates, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv12159
Plaintiff:
Wessam Bou-Assaly and Nancy Hage
Defendant:
George P. Mann & Associates, P.C. , George P. Mann , Margolis Law P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leaf v. Refn et al
as 2:2016cv12149
Defendant:
Nicolas Winding Refn, Bold Firms, Inc., Odd Lot Entertainment LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Martin H Leaf
Zueski v. MSP et al
as 4:2015cv13902
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Zueski
Defendant:
MSP, Woodhaven Police Department, Michael Wachsberg and others
Hassinger v. Kaygusuz et al
as 2:2015cv12550
Plaintiff:
Jane Hassinger
Defendant:
Mehmet Kaygusuz, Kaygusuz Yachting and Yachtino GmbH i/s/h/a Happy Charter, a Division of Yachtino GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilliam v. Ordiway et al
as 5:2015cv11833
Plaintiff:
Jerry Gilliam
Defendant:
William H. Ordiway, Jr. and Marveilyn Talisic Ordiway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosebush et al v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14033
Plaintiff:
Tonya Gay Rosebush and H. R.
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and James Rochford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard v. Scott et al
as 4:2012cv15319
Plaintiff:
Melissa Marie Hubbard
Defendant:
Glen Leon Scott, John Chisa , Jason Piercey and others
Kerns v. McKeil Work Boats Limited
as 2:2012cv13201
Plaintiff:
Fred H. Kerns, Jr.
Defendant:
McKeil Work Boats Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Shelton et al v. Detroit Receiving Hospital et al
as 2:2012cv11313
Plaintiff:
Quincy H Shelton and Quincy Shelton's Christian Ministries
Defendant:
Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit Medical Center - Detroit, VanGuard Hospital and others
Victor v. Roscommon County Probation Department et al
as 1:2011cv15143
Plaintiff:
Kim L Victor
Defendant:
Roscommon County Probation Department, Roscommon County Friend of the Court, George H. Foust and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
