Cases 71 - 80 of 122
Miller v. Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.
as 1:2008cv00207
Plaintiff:
Max Miller
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nash v. Russell et al
as 4:2008cv00107
Plaintiff:
Pauline Nash
Defendant:
Keith Russell, Richard A. Lindley, Rose Creek Funding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
Robert Bennett, Charles Bennett, Circle B Farms and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Bioscience NV and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rice v. CitiFinancial, Inc. al
as 1:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rice, Jimmy Lee Rice, Nida Lee Rice and others
Defendant:
CitiFinancial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pate v. Pate, Jr. et al
as 4:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sharon Townsend Pate
Defendant:
Calvin Pate, Jr. and Settlement Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Oasis Legal Finance, LLC v. Catledge et al
as 1:2008cv00052
Plaintiff:
Oasis Legal Finance, LLC
Defendant:
William Catledge, Catledge Law Firm and M & F Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lewis v. Adam et al
as 2:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Lewis
Defendant:
George F. "Rick&q Adam, Joe Walker, Jan A. D'Angelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fleming v. Montgomery et al
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Fleming
Defendant:
David Baird Montgomery, Montgomery Commodities, Inc. and R.J. O'Brien Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Custom Recycling Services, Inc. et al v. Blake Equipment Sales, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00306
Plaintiff:
Custom Recycling Services, Inc. and Justin Hasting
Defendant:
Blake Equipment Sales, LLC and Charles Nathan Blake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
