Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Beecham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00116
Plaintiff: Kristen B. Beecham
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Stephens v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2011cv00100
Plaintiff: Hortense Stephens
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raimey v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2011cv00009
Plaintiff: Pattie Raimey
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brand et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2010cv00332
Plaintiff: Robert S. Brand, Sr. and Mary Swat Redmond
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abron et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2010cv00151
Plaintiff: Jimmy Abron , Lorenzo Esters , Mae Baker and others
Defendant: Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2010cv00149
Plaintiff: Christy Banks , Willie Simon , Mary Branch and others
Defendant: Frank Williams and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickens v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2010cv00138
Plaintiff: Marvin Dickens
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2010cv00241
Plaintiff: Richard Gardner
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keye v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2010cv00238
Plaintiff: Robbye A. Keye
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00103
Plaintiff: Dorothy Nelson
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?