Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 92
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Commissioning & Green Building Solutions, Inc. v. Pontchartrain Partners LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Commissioning & Green Building Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Pontchartrain Partners LLC and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Majestic Mississippi, LLC v. US Alternator, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Majestic Mississippi, LLC
Defendant: US Alternator, LLC and Thomas Dault, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Joiner v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 3:2023cv00481
Plaintiff: Jack Joiner
Defendant: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bradley v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff: Leta J. Bradley
Defendant: Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc., Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff: Robin Kelly
Defendant: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sellers v. US Beverage Packers, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00432
Plaintiff: Shannon Sellers
Defendant: Arizona Beverages USA, LLC and US Beverage Packers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. S/W Electrical, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
Defendant: S/W Electrical, LLC, Suretech Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.55 Acre Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff: United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.55 Acre Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Kenneth Bowen, Jan R. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 3.94 Acres of Land, more or less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00108
Defendant: Bancorpsouth Bank, Easements and Rights-Of-Way Over 3.94 Acres of Land, more or less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Golf, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Bradley K. Little and United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?