Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Eddings v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Gordon D. Eddings
Defendant:
Kole Hill and Eastern Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Atkins et al v. Turnage and Sons LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Heather Atkins and Joseph Atkins
Defendant:
Turnage and Sons LLC and John Tracy Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill et al v. The Kenan Advantage Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Kenan Transport, LLC, John Nicholas Wilkens, The Kenan Advantage Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill and Dasie Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews v. Dart Container Corporation of California et al
as 1:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Deltry Hill and Dart Container Corporation of California
Plaintiff:
Michael Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Mason et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Orlando A. Hill and James Henley
Defendant:
Daniel L. Mason and Mason & Overstreet Welding and Machine Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill et al v. Li
as 2:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Hill , Deborah A. Hill , Brad A. Hill and others
Defendant:
Ping Y. Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al
as 3:2011cv00554
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hill and Glenda Shelby
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company and Unknown John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirby et al v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kirby and Pamela Hill Kirby
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Goldbourne et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Odette Bernard Goldbourne, Bryan Goldbourne, Spencer Brown and others
Defendant:
Curtize D. Johnson and Grey Hound Bus Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
