Cases 21 - 30 of 46
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2020ad00005
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Walker
as 3:2020ad00004
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Randolph Walker
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Mauk-Williams
as 3:2020ad00003
Respondent:
Charlene Mauk-Williams
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Abioto
as 3:2020ad00002
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Wanda X. Abioto
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Cotton
as 3:2020ad00001
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ramel L. Cotton
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Eckert et al v. Alexander
as 1:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
William H. Eckert and Anne Y. Eckert
Defendant:
Austin Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
The Mississippi Bar v. Tucker
as 3:2019ad00011
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Samuel L. Tucker
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Flechas
as 3:2019ad00010
Interested Party:
David C. Bramlette, III, Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander and others
Respondent:
Eduardo A. Flechas
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Gibbons
as 3:2019ad00009
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
David Cartan Loker Gibbons, Jr.
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Miller
as 3:2019ad00008
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Jonathan Adam Miller
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
