Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Denley et al v. University of Mississippi Medical Center et al
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerry Denley, J.D. and Chasity Denley
Defendant:
University of Mississippi Medical Center, Casey Shane McLearn and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Dwyer et al v. Crawford et al
as 1:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Crawford Realty Group, LLC, John Does 1-10, Crawford Realty, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Avra O'Dwyer and O'Dwyer Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Britt v. Merit Health Central et al
as 3:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Merit Health Central, American Medical Response (AMR), John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Immunomedics, Inc. v. Junghans et al
as 2:2017mc00174
Mediator:
Garrett E. Brown
Plaintiff:
Immunomedics, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard P. Junghans, Steven C. Katz , Roger Williams Medical Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
