Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey Before Judge Madeline Arleo
Cases 111 - 120 of 413
MAKARIOUS v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
as 2:2016cv09127
Plaintiff: ANDREW MAKARIOUS
Defendant: DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
MIAVANA & FAMILY, INC. v. VEL-MAC FOODS, INC., et al
as 2:2016cv08077
Petitioner: MIAVANA & FAMILY, INC.
Respondent: VEL-MAC FOODS, INC. and ANTHONY VELTRI
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
MEDICINE TO GO PHARMACIES, INC. v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv07741
Plaintiff: MEDICINE TO GO PHARMACIES, INC.
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
HALFON v. BUY BUY BABY, INC.
as 2:2016cv05037
Plaintiff: ERIC HALFON
Defendant: BUY BUY BABY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. v. DELHAYE et al
as 2:2016cv02358
Plaintiff: UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
Defendant: AURORA DELHAYE, FRANCOIS DELHAYE, ERIC DELHAYE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
DIMAYA v. WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE
as 2:2016cv00603
Plaintiff: IVIE A. DIMAYA
Defendant: WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolf v. Superior Court of New Jersey
as 2:2016cv00226
Petitioner: Karin Elena Wolf
Respondent: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ZELMA v. ECKER et al
as 2:2015cv08681
Plaintiff: RICHARD M. ZELMA
Defendant: LLOYD ECKER , ALL ABOUT THE BABY LLC , DOES' (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BETHEL NUTRITIONAL CONSULTING, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv08046
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BETHEL NUTRITIONAL CONSULTING, INC., FELIX V. RAMIREZ and KARINY C. RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KAHN v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGMENT, INC.
as 2:2015cv05968
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE KAHN
Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?