Cases 101 - 110 of 247
ORLOWSKI v. ORLOWSKI
as 2:2016cv01283
Plaintiff:
JOANNA B. ORLOWSKI
Defendant:
ROBERT ORLOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HARRON
as 2:2016cv00522
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
MIRZA HARRON
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and BRIDGET ANNE KELLY
Movant:
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP INC. , BLOOMBERG L.P. , NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SAUREN FONDS-SELECT SICAV v. PRAMERICA REAL ESTATE INVESTORS
as 2:2016cv00133
Petitioner:
SAUREN FONDS-SELECT SICAV
Respondent:
PRAMERICA REAL ESTATE INVESTORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
SCALERCIO-ISENBERG v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
SHERRY SCALERCIO-ISENBERG
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOUZA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
as 2:2015cv07453
Movant:
WILLIAM T. BOUZA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HYATT v. STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv05192
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HYATT
Defendant:
STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
SCHIRRIPA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv03649
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NATHAN SCHIRRIPA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THAKURI v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2015cv02506
Plaintiff:
PEMA DHOKA THAKURI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GREENSPAN v. HCG DIET COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GREENSPAN
Defendant:
HCG DIET COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
