Cases 101 - 110 of 647
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McKinney v. Miller
as 1:2019cv05312
Petitioner:
William D. McKinney
Respondent:
C. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Lee
as 1:2019cv04488
Petitioner:
Trevor Anderson
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Booker v. Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
as 2:2019cv03758
Petitioner:
Diquan Booker
Respondent:
Hon. William J. O'Brien, Robert Schalk and Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booker v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2019cv03864
Defendant:
Hon. William J. O'Brien and Robert Schalk Esq
Plaintiff:
Diquan Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Lee
as 2:2019cv03986
Respondent:
William Lee
Petitioner:
Anthony Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walden v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2019cv03688
Defendant:
Attorney Lawrence Schwartz, Detective Jamed Meehan, Detective Steve Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
John Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2019cv03311
Plaintiff:
Andre Diggs
Defendant:
Cynthia Brann, City of New York, Captain Boswer-Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quaye v. Lee
as 1:2019cv03097
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Petitioner:
Humphries Quaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
