Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Arbaje-Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv04091
Petitioner:
Jorge H. Arbaje-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Whaley et al v. Lopez et al
as 2:2012cv02889
Defendant:
Florfidia Alfaro, Keyby Julissa Ochoa Antunez, Special Agent William E. Brust and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rivera and John Whaley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales et al v. DeMarco
as 2:2011cv05177
Plaintiff:
Juan Cajamarca, Marun Canales, Reynaldo De Jesus and others
Defendant:
Vincent F. DeMarco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Warden Elmira Correctional Facility
as 1:2011cv03919
Petitioner:
Nelson Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Elmira Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00686
Petitioner:
Tomas Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. Terrell
as 1:2010cv02481
Petitioner:
Wilfren Alexi Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diaz v. Bellnier
as 1:2008cv04009
Petitioner:
Frederick Diaz
Respondent:
Joseph F. Bellnier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Graham
as 1:2007cv05379
Petitioner:
Efraim Diaz
Respondent:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. USA
as 1:2007cv01685
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julio Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
George v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv01527
Plaintiff:
Anthony George
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Adams, Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
