Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Deokoro v. Graham
as 1:2016cv05487
Petitioner:
Omo Deokoro
Respondent:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. USA
as 2:2016cv03410
Petitioner:
Larone Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Graham
as 1:2016cv03218
Respondent:
Superintendent Harold Graham
Petitioner:
Hakim Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2016cv02205
Defendant:
Superintendent Harold Graham, John Does 1 through 10, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Graham
as 1:2016cv01285
Petitioner:
Carl Allen
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2016cv00869
Defendant:
Superintendent Harold Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and Correctional Officer David Walters
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv06205
Defendant:
Superintendent H. Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson, New York Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Graham
as 1:2015cv05461
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Luis Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kearney v. Graham
as 1:2015cv04829
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Richard Kearney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Graham
as 1:2015cv03686
Petitioner:
Richard Collins
Respondent:
Superintendent Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
