Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Williams v. NYS Office of Mental Health et al
as 1:2010cv01022
Defendant:
Alice Doe, Unit Chief Barbara Burrajhts, Dr. Jacqueline Castelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility
as 1:2009cv02637
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Superintendent, Green haven Correctional Facility
as 1:2009cv01904
Petitioner:
James Robinson
Respondent:
Superintendent, Green haven Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Ercole et al
as 1:2008cv04387
Petitioner:
Jerry Green
Respondent:
Robert Ercole and Attorney General's Office for the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility
as 1:2008cv04204
Petitioner:
Thomas Walker
Respondent:
Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Bantum et al
as 1:2008cv03619
Plaintiff:
Lyonel Green
Defendant:
Karen Bantum, Windy Cylet, Gabriel Nacelewicz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greene v. Ercole
as 2:2008cv01204
Petitioner:
Tito Greene
Respondent:
Robert Ercole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv03939
Plaintiff:
Lyonel Green
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, N.Y.P.D. Swat Team and N.Y.C.E.M.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ojar v. Greene
as 1:2007cv03674
Petitioner:
Adam Ojar
Respondent:
Gary Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Green Haven Correctional Facility
as 1:2007cv02572
Petitioner:
Nathaniel James
Respondent:
Green Haven Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
