Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Giles v. Goalas et al
as 2:2021cv01977
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, ADA Executive Denis Ryan and Judge Goalas
Plaintiff:
Darnell Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivo v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe, United States of America and John or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Olivo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2017cv06968
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1, Max Moe #1, Max Moe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatson v. F.B.I. et al
as 2:2015cv03387
Defendant:
SA Joseph J. Azzata, Bayonne Police Department, Bergen County Prosecutor's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Tokyo Gatson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malloy v. Hynes et al
as 1:2013cv00476
Defendant:
Noha Momtaz - Tahrir Arafa, Correction Captain Nelson of RNDC C-74 Rikers Island, Correction Officer Baptists RNDC C-74 Rikers Island and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malloy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2010cv05836
Defendant:
ABC Title Insurance Company, Michael Adams, Kamil Atta and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 1:2009cv02232
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions, Metropolitan Detention Center, Metropolitan Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awan v. Ashcroft et al
as 2:2009cv01653
Plaintiff:
Khalid Awan
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Robert S. Mueller, III, Barry Mawn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Alexander et al
as 1:2008cv03951
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Muhammad
Defendant:
George B. Alexander, J. Cox, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
