Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, P.O. Suprina, P.O. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Animashaun v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2017cv04297
Plaintiff:
Damilola Animashaun
Defendant:
Detective Alex Arty, Sergeant DePestre, District Attorney's Office and others
Brooklyn North Warrant:
New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Animashaun v. Schmidt et al
as 1:2017cv03026
Plaintiff:
Damilola Animashaun
Defendant:
Detective Alex Arty, Detective Jeffery Haffenden, New York Police Department 73rd Precint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Supreme Court State of New York, Second Judicial District et al
as 1:2017cv01693
Defendant:
Sheila Abdus-Salam, Rachel Amy Adams, Sylvia G. Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholson v. Police Officer, Thomas Schmidt et al
as 2:2016cv02398
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nicholson
Defendant:
Police Officer, John Doe, Police Officer, Thomas Schmidt and Suffolk County, N.Y
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. City of New York Police Department et al
as 1:2014cv07012
Defendant:
City of New York Police Department and Officer Eric Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmidt v. Kelly
as 1:2012cv04419
Respondent:
Eileen Kelly
Petitioner:
Robert A. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caroselli v. Curci et al
as 1:2008cv01743
Plaintiff:
Dino Caroselli
Defendant:
Michael Curci, Plummer E. Lott, Reinoldo E. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2007cv03335
Plaintiff:
Donell Brown
Defendant:
Matthew R. Schmidt, Angelo Ierardi, William G. Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
