Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01993
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
American Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litigation (NO II)
as 1:2011md02221
Plaintiff:
Ahold U.S.A. Inc., Albertson's LLC, Animal Land, Inc. and others
In Re:
American Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litigation (NO II)
Defendant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Interested Party:
Government Plaintiffs in 10-cv-4496
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Witty v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv04000
Defendant:
Eckerd Corporation and Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Yvon Witty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ibea v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2010cv03075
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ibea
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Omre v. Dorfman et al
as 1:2010cv01677
Plaintiff:
David Omre
Defendant:
MD Vernon G. Dorfman, MD Steven Komar, MD Shawn M. Field and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rite Aid Corporation et al v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02315
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid HDQTRS.Corp. and others
Defendant:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Juszcuk v. Eckerd Pharmacy et al
as 2:2008cv00395
Plaintiff:
Louise Juszcuk
Defendant:
Eckerd Pharmacy and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thompson v. Auto RX,et al
as 2:2007cv04287
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson
Defendant:
Auto RX, LC, Rite-Aid Corporation, Brian Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
