Cases 41 - 50 of 296
Lau et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Rosebrock, Christopher Jason Rozanski, David William Haalili Lau and others
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., ZTE (TX) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thornburgh
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Abe Eisenstat and others
Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thornburgh
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Abe Eisenstat and others
Harris v. Lilley et al
as 1:2022cv02248
Plaintiff:
Eric Harris
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Cheryl V. Morris, Lynn M. McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Dixon et al v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2021cv05090
Plaintiff:
Shaw-Nae Dixon, Thomas Casatelli, Jeanette Rivera and others
Defendant:
Bill DeBlasio and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Wang v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Abdelaal v. Morris et al
as 1:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Ashraf Abdelaal
Defendant:
David Morris and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
