Cases 41 - 50 of 501
Chizor v. Lilley
as 1:2021cv04411
Petitioner:
Reuben Chizor
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn J. Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Bell
as 1:2021cv03570
Respondent:
Superintendent Bell
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brefo-Sarpong v. Titus
as 1:2021cv03036
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Petitioner:
Joseph Brefo-Sarpong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milton v. Superintendent
as 1:2021cv03037
Respondent:
Superintendent
Petitioner:
Robert Milton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Johnson
as 1:2021cv03061
Respondent:
Superintendent J. Johnson
Petitioner:
Luis Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Keyser
as 1:2021cv02859
Respondent:
Superintendent William F. Keyser
Petitioner:
Kevin Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winston v. Capra
as 1:2021cv02495
Petitioner:
Tyrone Winston
Respondent:
Superintendent Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnette v. Superintendent of Eastern Corr.
as 1:2021cv02596
Respondent:
Superintendent of Eastern Corr.
Petitioner:
Andrew Barnette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mena v. Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility
as 1:2021cv02599
Respondent:
Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Jonathan Mena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
