Cases 51 - 60 of 164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith et al v. Kings County Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv06209
Defendant:
Tom Anatache, City of New York, Jimmy Jasmon and others
Plaintiff:
April S., Aaron Smith, Jr., Aaron A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Jasmon et al
as 1:2017cv06180
Defendant:
Tom Anatache, Anatiche, Jimmy Jasmon and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Direct Express Comerica Bank et al
as 1:2017cv06204
Defendant:
Tom Anatacial, Direct Express Comerica Bank, Direct Express Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lilley et al v. Lent et al
as 1:2017cv01585
Defendant:
Patricia Lent and Robert Lent
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lilley and Tom Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00904
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Rubinstein et al
as 1:2017cv00723
Defendant:
Rubinstein, Israel Rubinstein, Konstantin Yevinson and others
Plaintiff:
Maspeth Federal Savings and Loan Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
