Cases 61 - 70 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05685
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Powell-Dickerson v. Bell
as 1:2019cv05062
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Petitioner:
Ragene Powell-Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alcantara v. Bell
as 1:2019cv03686
Petitioner:
Cirilo Alcantara
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Bell
as 1:2019cv03218
Respondent:
Superintendent Bell
Petitioner:
Luis Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kim v. Sushi Bell Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02847
Defendant:
Sushi Bell Inc. and Soonmyong Park
Plaintiff:
Chong Soo Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
New York Life Insurance Company v. Hamiel et al
as 1:2019cv02227
Defendant:
Frank R. Bell Funeral Home, Inc., Destiny Hamiel, Desia Hamiel and others
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Bell v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv01794
Plaintiff:
Jesse Bell
Defendant:
Comm'r of Socia Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lee v. Bell
as 1:2019cv01879
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Petitioner:
Tyrone P. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sidbury v. Name Unknown et al
as 1:2019cv01136
Defendant:
P.O. Bell, Name Unknown and Wugo
Plaintiff:
Steven Sidbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zavalata Martinez v. Bell Blvd Delights Corp. et. al.
as 2:2019cv00776
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alfredo Zavalata Martinez
Defendant:
George Bouzalas, Bell Blvd Delights Corp., Jose Bonilla and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
