Cases 71 - 80 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00671
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00670
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00672
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00666
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00668
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00573
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Szabo v. Legal Aid Society et al
as 1:2017mc00219
Defendant:
City of New York, County of Richmond, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Szabo
Djeriou et al v. Richmond Diner Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05437
Defendant:
Hassan Aly and Richmond Diner Restaurant Inc.
Plaintiff:
Khaldia Djeriou, Kubra Polat and Eugene Yanovskiy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Golub v. Swaaley et al
as 1:2016cv05386
Plaintiff:
Dr. J. David Golub
Defendant:
Norman J. Golub, Jack Stern and Michael L. Swaaley
R. Gigante:
Richmond County Surrogate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Acevedo et al v. Richmond County Ambulance Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04678
Plaintiff:
Angel Acevedo and Francheska Matos
Defendant:
Ephram M. Lahasky and Richmond County Ambulance Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
