Cases 71 - 80 of 93
-LB Dowdy v. P.A. Hercules et al
as 1:2007cv02488
Defendant:
Dr. R. Beaudouin, M.D., Dr. Borecky, M.D., RN K. Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
-RML Remice v. Zenk et al
as 1:2003cv00286
:
and
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Karleen Toni Remice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shapiro v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01944
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Shapiro
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc., Aukroyd Lake, Guian Backus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whalen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv01572
Petitioner:
Richard J. Whalen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Brenda O'Donnell and Renda
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv04816
Petitioner:
Robert James Fox
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and C. Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hudson v. Lindsay et al
as 1:2008cv04658
Petitioner:
Harvey J. Hudson
Respondent:
Cameron Lindsay, United States of America, United States Attorneys, NY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Santa v. Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn
as 1:2008cv03891
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Santa
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Doctor Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04016
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
James v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv02044
Plaintiff:
Shanell James
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
