Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Yesh Music, LLC v. Cabell Childress & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2020cv06326
Plaintiff:
Yesh Music, LLC
Defendant:
Cabell Childress & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Podius et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv06121
Plaintiff:
William Alvarado, Sandy Batista, Errol Campbell and others
Defendant:
Counselor Bennett, Unit Manager J. Childress, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isbell v. Childress et al
as 1:2016cv04611
Defendant:
Ronald G. Childress and Intelliprops Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mykel Isbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Centennial Elevator Industries, Inc. v. Centennial Elevators Ind., Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv04580
Defendant:
Centennial Elevat0r Industries, Inc., Centennial Elevators Ind., Corp., Brian Childress and others
Plaintiff:
Centennial Elevator Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lewis v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2014cv03284
Defendant:
J. Childress, M. Ferguson, Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Childress et al
as 1:2013cv00879
Respondent:
J. Childress, A. Ferguson and K. Spivey
Petitioner:
Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Brien v. Strada et al
as 1:2013cv05698
Defendant:
R. Beaudouin, M.D., M. Borecky, M.D., Assistant Warden Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
John J O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cohen v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00003
Defendant:
Joseph Archer, N. Ausch, Robert Beaudouin and others
Plaintiff:
L.C. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Childress et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02963
Plaintiff:
James Childress and Kathy Childress
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
