Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Castro David v. B & D Auto Collision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Castro David
Defendant:
B & D Auto Collision, Inc. and Brian DRepaul
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Perez v. B & D Snacks Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
B & D Snacks Inc. and William Delquaglio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
D. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al
as 1:2019cv00354
Defendant:
Maria Torres-Springer and New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development
Plaintiff:
B. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VAS TAXI INC. et al v. FREIDMAN et al
as 1:2017cv06478
Defendant:
28TH STREET MANAGEMENT INC., BANCO POPULAR COMMUNITY BANK, CREATIVE MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AL-ALL CAB CORP., ARAGVI TAXI INC., ARBAT TAXI INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Vas Taxi Inc. et al v. Freidman et al
as 1:2017cv06533
Defendant:
28th Street Management Inc., Banco Popular Community Bank, Creative Mobile Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Al-All Cab Corp., Aragvi Taxi Inc., Arbat Taxi Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
B&D Associate Representatives, Inc. v. American Conec Corporation
as 2:2014cv01334
Defendant:
American Conec Corporation
Plaintiff:
B&D Associate Representatives, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Schwartz v. B&D Remodeling & Restoration, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05428
Defendant:
B&D Remodeling & Restoration, Inc. and JNC Holdings LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
