Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chadha et al v. Tech Matrix Infosolutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03739
Defendant:
Santusht Bhatia, Cerno Technologies, Inc., Sanjay Chadha and others
Plaintiff:
Cerno Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Munish Chadha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. Cellular Wholesale Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02997
Defendant:
BDSJ Tech Corp., Kusum Bhatia, Ranjit Bhatia and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Chowdhury et al
as 1:2015cv00983
Defendant:
31st Street Medical Services, P.C., M.D. Nicky Bhatia, Raihan Chowdhury and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rosales et al v. Heritage Indian Cuisine et al
as 2:2014cv04865
Plaintiff:
Edward Alcantara, Ana Alfaro, Jose Dominguez and others
Defendant:
Anil Rai Bhatia, Neil Bhatia and Heritage Indian Cuisine
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gallaro et al v. New York Presbyterian Hospital et al
as 2:2008cv00544
Plaintiff:
Christine Gallaro, John Gallaro, Christine Gallaro and others
Defendant:
New York Presbyterian Hospital, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian,, Metroblood service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Howard Johnson International, Inc. v. Niteen Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2007mc00083
Plaintiff:
Howard Johnson International, Inc.
Defendant:
Niteen Holdings, LLC and Ramesh Bhatia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
