Cases 1 - 10 of 17
KILROY ARCHITECTURAL WINDOWS, INC. v. DISTRICT COUNCIL 9 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES
as 9:2023cv06384
Plaintiff:
KILROY ARCHITECTURAL WINDOWS, INC.
Defendant:
DISTRICT COUNCIL 9 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kilroy Architectural Windows, Inc. v. District Council 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
as 2:2023cv06384
Plaintiff:
Kilroy Architectural Windows, Inc.
Defendant:
District Council 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds et al v. Rockwell Maintenance
as 1:2021cv05488
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds, District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO and (Metal Polishers Production and Novelty Workers Local Union 8A-28A)
Defendant:
Rockwell Maintenance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Zion Contracting, LLC v. District Council No. 9, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
as 2:2019cv07014
Defendant:
District Council No. 9, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Plaintiff:
Zion Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades 1974 v. Purde Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv05257
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Noramco, Inc., Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades 1974
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds et al v. Kenny Building Services, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05120
Defendant:
Kenny Building Services, Inc. a/k/a Kenny Building Maintenance Corp., Kenny Building Services, Inc. and Kenny Building Maintenance Corp.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds and The International Union of Painters and Allied Trades; Metal Polishers Production and Novelty Workers Local Union 8A-28A/District Council 9
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Joval Paint Corp. d/b/a Sol Rubin Painting v. John Drew, as President and Director of Servicing of District Council No. 9, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. et al
as 1:2019cv02967
Defendant:
Juan Quijije and John Drew, as President and Director of Servicing of District Council No. 9, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Plaintiff:
Joval Paint Corp. d/b/a Sol Rubin Painting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Joval Paint Corp. d/b/a Sol Rubin Painting v. John Drew, as President and Director of Servicing of District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. et al
as 1:2019cv02968
Defendant:
John Drew, as President and Director of Servicing of District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. and Nelson Barbecho
Plaintiff:
Joval Paint Corp. d/b/a Sol Rubin Painting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds et al v. Liberty Metal & Marble Inc.
as 1:2019cv01553
Defendant:
Liberty Metal & Marble Inc. a/k/a Liberty Metal & Marble, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Metal Polishers Local 8A-28A Funds and The International Union of Painters and Allied Trades; Metal Polishers Production and Novelty Workers Local Union 8A-28A/District Council 9
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
