Cases 91 - 100 of 6,008
Duffy v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Brian Duffy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Livingston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Livingston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Erica L. Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Updike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Updike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Michele Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chamberlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
William E. Chamberlin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Backus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Kalieka D. Backus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lobdell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lobdell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Capparello v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jolean R. Capparello
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lea Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
