Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roemer, III et al
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
William J. Roemer, III, John F. Hughes and Roemer & Hughes Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Arnold v. Vanderbilt & Associates, LLC
as 3:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
William Arnold, Jr.
Defendant:
Vanderbilt & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Association, Inc. et al v. State of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01523
Plaintiff:
Diane Davis, David L. Faile, Louis Giampaglia and others
Defendant:
Caroline W. Ahl, Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Artis et al v. Amphenol Corporation
as 3:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Crystal Artis , Helen Ballard , Raymond Ballard and others
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Erudite Incorporated v. Arcadia Manufacturing Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00830
Plaintiff:
Erudite Incorporated
Defendant:
Arcadia Manufacturing Group, Inc. , Mike Werner , Dale Roberts and others
Counter_claimant:
Dale Roberts, Mike Werner, Arcadia Manufacturing Group, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Erudite Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Gasaway v. Williams et al
as 8:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Edmon Gasaway
Defendant:
Benard Williams and Randy Silvis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Case name not on file
as 1:2011mc00034
Trustee:
William M. McCarthy
Respondent:
Creative Culinary Concepts, Inc. and James D. Linnan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chesapeake Industrial Leasing Co., Inc. v. Hudson et al
as 5:2011mc00002
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Industrial Leasing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
William S. Hudson, W.S. Hudson Converting Machinery and W.S. Hudson Converting, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
