Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Ingraham et al v. Cumo et al
as 1:2020cv00147
Defendant:
Herkimer Villiage Court, Trac Phone Insurance, Rashad Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glen et al v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
as 1:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Glen and Rosina K. Abramson
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Widrick v. Mustare et al
as 7:2012cv01767
Plaintiff:
Dustin Widrick
Defendant:
Richard Mustare, Cameron Porter, Joseph LaParr and others
Consol_plaintiff:
The Travelers Idemnity Company , Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company
Consol_defendant:
Richard Mustare, Dustin Widrick , Cameron Porter and others
Consol_cross_claimant:
Dustin Widrick
Consol_cross_defendant:
Joseph LaParr, Richard Mustare and Cameron Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Troy Belting & Supply Company et al
as 1:2011cv00912
Plaintiff:
Pacific Employers Insurance Company
Defendant:
Troy Belting & Supply Company , The Hartford Insurance Company, ABC Companies 1 through 20 and others
Cross_claimant:
Troy Belting & Supply Company
Cross_defendant:
The Hartford Insurance Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and others
Counter_claimant:
Troy Belting & Supply Company
Counter_defendant:
Pacific Employers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hobbs' Home & Hardware, Inc. et al v. Twin City Insurance Co. et al
as 6:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
Hobbs' Home & Hardware, Inc., Lawrence A. Hobbs and Patricia A. Hobbs
Defendant:
Twin City Insurance Co., Twin City Insurance Co., Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
