Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sims v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Jack Shapiro and Cindy Katz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2018cv03284
Plaintiff:
Karin Elizabeth Sims
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The State of Georgia, The State of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Westchester County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv01786
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Sims
Defendant:
Westchester County Dept. of Corrections, Horowitz, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv02485
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Sims
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Dora B. Schriro, Evelyn A. Mirabal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Sim et al
as 1:2015cv01333
Plaintiff:
Joel Edgar Santos
Defendant:
Jim Yong Sim, Benebenti and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv03986
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
John Doe, City of Yonkers and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The White Plains, N.Y. Police Department
as 1:2010cv05968
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
The White Plains, N.Y. Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The White Plains, N.Y. Police Dept. Narcotic Division et al
as 1:2010cv04765
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
The White Plains, N.Y. Police Dept. Narcotic Division and The White Plains, N.Y. Police Dept. Special Response Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Farrelly et al
as 1:2010cv04765
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Farrelly and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The White Plains, N.Y. Police Dept. Narcotic Division et al
as 7:2010cv04765
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Farrelly, John Doe, Goldfarb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
