Cases 31 - 40 of 737
Phoenix v. Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc.
as 7:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
William Phoenix
Defendant:
Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Belendez-Desha v. JAF Communications, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Pilar Belendez-Desha
Defendant:
JAF Communications, Inc. and JAF Communications, Inc. doing business as The Messenger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
Dittes v. ChargeAfter USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Tia Dittes
Defendant:
ChargeAfter USA, Inc., ChargeAfter Inc., Mark Denman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal- Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Carter v. Fresh Dining Concepts LLC
as 1:2023cv10713
Plaintiff:
Kiera Carter
Defendant:
Fresh Dining Concepts LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bamond v. Force 1 One Retail Solutions, LLC
as 1:2023cv10448
Plaintiff:
Jon Bamond
Defendant:
Force 1 One Retail Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Manukian v. Procida Construction Corp.
as 1:2023cv10249
Plaintiff:
Armen Manukian
Defendant:
Procida Construction Corp. New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Troeger v. JetBlue Airways Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10859
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Troeger
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, William Petersen, Wayne Jr. Mayers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ophir v. Koneksa Health Inc et al
as 1:2023cv09145
Plaintiff:
Gol Ophir
Defendant:
Koneksa Health Inc and Chris Benko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rakowicz et al v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09254
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Rakowicz, Roman Karwan, Adam Koniarz and others
Defendant:
ABM Industry Groups, LLC and UG2 LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
