Cases 11 - 20 of 405
Schweers v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv06189
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Theodore W Schweers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robert Shapiro v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv05982
Plaintiff:
Robert Shaprio and Robert Shapiro
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Madigan v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv05725
Plaintiff:
Attorney Victor Fusco and Robert P. Madigan
Defendant:
Geoffrey S. Berman, Nancy Ann Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Andrew Saul and others
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wynter v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv05592
Plaintiff:
Diana Wynter
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillip v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv05459
Plaintiff:
Binta Phillip
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Febles-Oliveras v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv05412
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Abraham Febles-Oliveras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv05430
Defendant:
Nancy Ann Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Valle v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv05197
Plaintiff:
Ruben Valle
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Champagne-Kuchar v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv05087
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gillian Champagne-Kuchar
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lahey v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv05086
Plaintiff:
Shawn P. Lahey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
