Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Jones v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08138
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., L.W. Varner, Jr., S. Tracy Coster and others
Harding v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08119
Plaintiff:
Virgil Harding
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., Donald McAleenan, Robert Scott Vansant and others
Pepper et al v. Fluent, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06581
Plaintiff:
Cody Pepper, Terri Pepper, Julius Bryant and others
Defendant:
Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Calenture, LLC et al v. B. Riley Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06087
Plaintiff:
Calenture, LLC and Deborah Donoghue
Defendant:
B. Riley Financial, Inc. and Bryant R. Riley
Nominal Defendant:
Franchise Group, Inc.
Kassim et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv05027
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Plaintiff:
Bryant Deli And Grocery Corp. and Mohamed Kassim
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Tkatch v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01187
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Greg Robitaille, Aytu BioScience, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Natalia Tkatch
Kates v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00953
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Kates
Smith v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00940
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Hayley Smith
London v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00874
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Jack London
Coffman v. Perceptron, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09527
Defendant:
Perceptron, Inc., William C. Taylor, John F. Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Coffman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
