Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Cohen v. Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02849
Plaintiff: Arnold Cohen
Defendant: Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. , Zhiguo Fu and Guohua Wan
Movant: Gary Bleiweiss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CEO Clubs, Inc. et al v. Worthy, II et al
as 7:2010cv06729
Plaintiff: CEO Clubs, Inc. , Hudson Valley Consultants, LLC and Metropolitan Business Alliance, LLC
Defendant: William M Worthy, II, David Clark, Louis Deluca and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Boyarsky et al v. Hoberman et al
as 1:2010cv03010
Plaintiff: Joel Boyarsky, Accountants Proprietary Financial Servicenet, Inc., The Pamela B. Ela Tiner Living Trust and others
Defendant: Robert Hoberman , Mitchel May, HGL Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Drago v. Garment et al
as 7:2008cv06356
Plaintiff: Stephen Drago
Defendant: John S. Garment, Stephen A. Alexander, John E. Durante and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Ross v. Cole et al
as 1:2008cv01299
Plaintiff: Arnold J. Ross
Defendant: Earl W. Cole, III, Michael L. Falcone, Williams S. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Giles v. Nuvelo, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01777
Plaintiff: Arnold Giles, Arnold Giles, Arnold Giles and others
Defendant: Nuvelo, Inc., Nuvelo, Inc., Nuvelo, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Securities Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2006md01744
Plaintiff: The Kendall Trust, The Kendall Trust, The Kendall Trust and others
Defendant: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and others
Special Master: Parcher & Hayes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv03288
Consolidated Plaintiff: Sam P. Seay, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Jere L. Beasley and others
Consolidated Defendant: Bank of America Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Group and others
Petitioner: Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of operating Engineers-Employers Construction Retirement Trust, The National Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, State of Alaska Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff: Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 577 Pension Fund, Wayne L. Matthews, George T. Flyny and others
Intervenor Defendant: Jack Grubman, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Claimant: Paul G. Rochmis, UBS Financial Services Inc., Holly M. Haik and others
Appellant: Terry Neal, Teresa O. Moxley, Retirement Systems of Alabama and others
Defendant: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Worldcom, Inc., ABN Amro Incorporated and others
Lead Plaintiff: New York State Common Retirement Fund, HGK Asset Management, H. Carl McCall and others
Respondent: Roslyn Berger
Not Classified By Court: Jane B. Selfe, James J. Savage, Cynthia R. Levin Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1988cv04486
Defendant: Teamsters Local 710 & John T. Coli, Individually, Joseph W. Morgan, Eugene Boffa, Sr. and others
Interested Party: Abraham Moreno and Gary Guillory
Petitioner: Dane Passo, Francis Gillen, Charles M. Carberry and others
Respondent: Gerald Pauli, Joseph Kouba, Paul Roa and others
Intervenor: Patrick Flynn, Kevin Wagoner and Larry Alexander
Undetermined: Teamster Local 710 & John T. Coli, Individually, Frank Radice and Richard W. Mark
Appellant: Thomas Flaherty and James Deamicis
Amicus Curiae: Teamsters for a Democratic Union
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?