Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Spitz v. Collection Technology, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv03738
Plaintiff:
Miriam Spitz
Defendant:
Collection Technology, Inc. and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 Through 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Friedman v. The Law Office of Kevin Z. Shine, PLLC et al
as 7:2012cv03739
Plaintiff:
Varda Friedman
Defendant:
The Law Office of Kevin Z. Shine, PLLC , John and Jane Does numbers 1 through 25 and Kevin Z. Shine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294
Colombi v. Nationwide Cash, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv03351
Plaintiff:
Stella Colombi
Defendant:
Nationwide Cash, Inc., Ernest Holden and One or More "John or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv08430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv04994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv04995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America ex rel. John and Jane Doe v. The Taconic Hills Central School District et al.
as 1:2011cv02699
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. John and Jane Doe
Defendant:
The New York State School Districts, New York City Department of Education , The Taconic Hills Central School District and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
