Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Trucking Association of New York v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2024cv04111
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority and Letitia James
Plaintiff:
Trucking Association of New York
Amicus Curiae:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501 Preemption (federal authority of intrastate transportation)
County Of Rockland et al v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority et al
as 7:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
County Of Rockland, County Executive Edwin J Day and Legislature Of The County Of Rockland
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Alliance for Fair and Equitable Contracting Today, Inc. v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2019cv10894
Defendant:
Patrick J. Foye and Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Fair and Equitable Contracting Today, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan et al v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv03985
Defendant:
Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Banco Santander (Mexico) S.A. Institucion De Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero and others
Plaintiff:
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan and Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 14
14th Street Coalition et al v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2018cv02925
Plaintiff:
14th Street Coalition , Disabled In Action of Metropolitan New York, Inc. , Council of Chelsea Block Associations and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority , New York City Transit Authority , City of New York Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Sevin et al v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
as 1:2017cv10051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sevin , Peter Delvecchio and The Association of Commuter Rail Employees
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yorkshire Towers Company L.P. et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2013cv01757
Plaintiff:
Yorkshire Towers Company L.P. and Yorkshire Towers Tenants Association
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Ray Lahood, Federal Transit Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
