Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Morales v. Roe et al
as 7:2023cv10427
Plaintiff:
Samuel Morales
Defendant:
Michael A Roe and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Roe et al v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv10865
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe and Police Officer "Jane" Doe
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Roe
as 1:2022cv08779
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Salaam v. Singh et al
as 1:2021cv02222
Defendant:
John Doe #1-#10, Jane Roe #1-10, John Doe Corporation 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Najah A Salaam
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Martinez v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center et al
as 1:2020cv01719
Defendant:
LUCY PALOMINO, N.P., FLORA ADELAIDE ANTWI, N.P., BRONX-LEBANON INTERGRATED SERVICES SYSTEM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Doe 1 et al v. Jeffrey Epstein et al
as 1:2019cv07675
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, Sue Roe and Roes 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Prendi v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
Rubin Prendi
Defendant:
City of New York , The New York City Police Department , Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Roe
as 7:2017cv06029
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lavy et al v. Wederburn et al
as 1:2016cv04096
Plaintiff:
Yaniv Lavy and Feiner & Lavy, PC
Defendant:
Marc Wederburn, Idir Bournane, Gabriela B. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case - Other
Kashef et al v. BNP Paribas SA et al
as 1:2016cv03228
Plaintiff:
Kashef, Entesar Osman Kashef, Alfadel Mosabal and others
Defendant:
BNP Paribas SA, BNP Paribas North America, Inc., Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
