Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10866
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buzaishvili v. Albence et al
as 1:2020cv04602
Petitioner:
Zurab Buzaishvili
Respondent:
Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and Chad F. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosemond v. Decker et al
as 7:2019cv09657
Petitioner:
Jean Rosemond
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Raheem v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv09134
Petitioner:
Yusuf Raheem
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kevin McAlleenan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Benson v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv07502
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kevin McAleena and others
Petitioner:
Kwesi Akosah Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Granados Hernandez v. McAleenan et al
as 7:2019cv07321
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Attorney General William P. Barr, Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary of DHS and others
Petitioner:
Oscar Javier Granados Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pacheco Uzho v. McAleena et al
as 1:2019cv07152
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, William P. Barr, Kevin McAleena and others
Petitioner:
Juan Manual Pacheco Uzho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Martin-Chavez v. Decker et al
as 1:2019cv06734
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Kevin K. McAleenan, Field Office Directo Thomas R. Decker and Attorney General William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Edy Martin-Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
