Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
United States of America v. $35,100,000 in United States Currency on deposit in account number 581186 in the name of EKC Grantor Trusts 2000 at Amarillo National Bank et al
as 1:2010cv03743
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $35,100,000 in United States Currency on deposit in account number 581186 in the name of EKC Grantor Trusts 2000 at Amarillo National Bank and $3,900,000 in United States currency on deposit in account number 581178 in the name of Wug Grantor Trusts 2000 at Amarillo National Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Qader v. Comptroller of Currency et al
as 1:2010cv00216
Plaintiff: Rose Marie Qader
Defendant: Comptroller of Currency, Federal Reserve Board, Discover Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
United States of America v. Funds on Deposit at JP Morgan Chase Bank Attorney Client Account No. 2920241011 et al
as 1:2009cv10074
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant-in-Rem: Funds on Deposit at JP Morgan Chase Bank Attorney Client Account No. 2920241011 and Funds on Deposit at JP Morgan Chase Bank Attorney Client Account No. 769247487
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 38,205.93 Formerly on Deposit at Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv04600
Plaintiff: United States of America and United States of America
Defendant-in-Rem: 38,205.93 Formerly on Deposit at Citibank, N.A. and 38,867.21 Formerly on Deposit at Hudson Valley Bank, in the name of Urbino Cesareo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $ 86,419.29 in funds formerly on deposit at Bank of America et al
as 1:2008cv08045
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant-in-Rem: $ 86,419.29 in funds formerly on deposit at Bank of America, $ 6,189.66 in funds formerly on deposit at Bank of America, $ 937.10 in funds formerly on deposit at Washington Mutual and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv05658
Petitioner: Eastern Savings Bank, FSB and Eastern Savings Bank, FSB
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. Funds on Deposit in any and all U.S. Interbank Accounts Maintained at Bank of America by the Bank of Nevis International, Federation of St. Kitts & Nevis
as 1:2008cv05505
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant-in-Rem: Funds on Deposit in any and all U.S. Interbank Accounts Maintained at Bank of America by the Bank of Nevis International, Federation of St. Kitts & Nevis
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. All Funds on Deposit at Global Bank of Commerce, Antigua, Account Number 47-11 et al
as 1:2008cv00593
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: All Funds on Deposit at Global Bank of Commerce, Antigua, Account Number 47-11, All Funds on Deposit at Bank of Montreal, Canada and Contents of Safe Deposit Box Number 214, in the name of Humberto Jose Castro Carrera
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $ 57,300.00 in funds formerly on deposit at Community State Bank
as 1:2007cv09937
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant-in-Rem: $ 57,300.00 in funds formerly on deposit at Community State Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Up to $ 6,100,000 on Deposit in Account No. 5876 at Bank Julius Baer Co. Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv04430
Plaintiff: United States of America and United States of America
Defendant-in-Rem: Up to $ 6,100,000 on Deposit in Account No. 5876 at Bank Julius Baer Co. Ltd and Up to $ 3,651,339 on Deposit in Account No. 5568 at Bank Julius Baer Co. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?