Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 150
United States Of America v. $56,243.55 Formerly On Deposit In Bank Of America Account 325160197444 Held In The Name Of Gudi Trading Inc., And All Monies, Funds And Assets Traceable Thereto et al
as 7:2024cv04529
Defendant: $312,098.86 Formerly On Deposit In JP Morgan Chase Account 909315555 Held In The Name of Zhongyong Trading Inc., And All Monies, Funds And Assets Traceable Thereto, $70,416.62 Formerly On Deposit In Bank of America Account 325079100467 Held In The Name Of YYJ Consulting Corporation, And All Monies, Funds And Assets Traceable Thereto and $56,243.55 Formerly On Deposit In Bank Of America Account 325160197444 Held In The Name Of Gudi Trading Inc., And All Monies, Funds And Assets Traceable Thereto
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States Of America v. $278,640.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03725
Defendant: $278,640.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
DeJesus Peguero Brito v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01800
Plaintiff: Angel DeJesus Peguero Brito
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
United States of America v. $399,109.93 in United States Currency formerly held in escrow by Escrow Showcase, Inc., Escrow File number 4507-HA, from the sale of 2635 Anna Street, Riverside, CA 92506 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05750
Defendant: $399,109.93 in United States Currency formerly held in escrow by Escrow Showcase, Inc., Escrow File number 4507-HA, from the sale of 2635 Anna Street, Riverside, CA 92506
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Okafor v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03544
Plaintiff: Nzelo Okafor
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
United States of America v. Baez
as 1:2022cv09195
Defendant: Alexis Baez, as Administrator of Estate of Luis Baez Noyer and Alexis Baez
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5321 Penalty; Reports of Currency and Foreign Transaction
United States of America v. $233,030.00 in United States currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02372
Defendant: $233,030.00 in United States currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $690,000 in United States currency, formerly on deposit in Bank of America Account XXXX2359, held in the name of LV.NET LLC LV NET et al
as 7:2022cv00266
Defendant: $690,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXX2359 HELD IN THE NAME OF LV.NET LLC LV NET, $81,284.03 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXX2488 HELD IN THE NAME OF CALIFORNIA IOLTA TRUST ACCOUNTS MADAEN LAW, INC., BROWNSVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $66,272 in United States currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05285
Defendant: $66,272 in United States currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $35,782,375 in United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05171
Defendant: $35,782,375 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?