Cases 11 - 20 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mendez v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv10039
Plaintiff:
Natalie Mendez and K.S.
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation, WALMART INC., Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Amy M Gernon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv07886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Levinhar-Be et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2022cv07739
Plaintiff:
Sapir Natalie Levinhar-Be and Liat Levinhar-Be
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
