Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Muse Paintbar LLC et al v. Influx Capital Group LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04577
Defendant:
TSVI DAVIS a/k/a STEVE DAVIS, Jonathan Braun, SQUARE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MUSE PAINTBAR LLC and STANLEY FINCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carcamo Moran et al v. Pizza on Stone, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv07643
Defendant:
Pearl Stone Restaurant Inc., Nick Angelis, Restaurant on the Square Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Enmanuel Carcamo Moran
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Panigua v. El Bohio Tropical Square Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08885
Plaintiff:
Elpidio Panigua
Defendant:
El Bohio Tropical Square Inc., 791 Bohio Restaurant Inc., El Bohio Sabroso Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Flores et al v. Sky Bar Times Square Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03387
Defendant:
Melvin Klinghoffer, A-1 Contract Staffing, Inc., Thierry Pomies and others
Plaintiff:
Marcial Flores
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas v. Love 466 Avenue of the Americas, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
Kalisha Thomas
Defendant:
Love 466 Avenue of the Americas, Inc. , Ricky's Soho, Inc. , Ricky's Union Square, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mahalick et al v. PQ New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00899
Plaintiff:
Lynn Mahalick , Anthony Scarsella and Stephan Ortiz
Defendant:
PQ New York, Inc., PQ Licensing S.A., PQ 933 Broadway and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Premium Sports Inc. v. Dooley et al
as 7:2012cv09082
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Thomas Emmett Woods and Mahoney's at Dooley Square, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
