Cases 11 - 20 of 342
Ma et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Yan Ma, Defeng Liu and Zhoulun Liu
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Chief Alissa L. Emmel and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00523
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
P.K. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
P.K.
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Newark Asylum Office (USCIS), Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ali v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
as 1:2023cv11127
Plaintiff:
Sameh Shaaban Ali
Defendant:
USCIS and U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
