Cases 31 - 40 of 121
In re: London Silver Fixing, Ltd., Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02573
Defendant:
The Bank of Nova Scotia, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Scotiabank also known as Scotiamocatta and others
Plaintiff:
Don Tran, Kevin Maher, John Hayes and others
Intervenor:
U.S. Department Of Justice
Not Classified By Court:
Yuri Alishaev, Vega Traders LLC, Morris Jeremias and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America v. $3,525,880.64 in Funds on Deposit in U.S. Interbank Account Number Ending in 8077 at Citibank Held in the Name of The Shanghai Pudong Development Bank et al
as 1:2014cv03015
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$3,525,880.64 in Funds on Deposit in U.S. Interbank Account Number Ending in 8077 at Citibank Held in the Name of The Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, $2,073,850.69 in Funds on Deposit in U.S. Interbank Account Number Ending in 6001 at Standard Chartered Bank (Formerly Account Number Ending in 5051 at American Express Bank) Held in the Name of, $704,212.36 in Funds on Deposit in U.S. Interbank Account Number Ending in 6390 at J.P. Morgan Chase Held in the Name of The Shanghai Pudong Development Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
VIP Engineering and Marketing Ltd v. Standard Chartered Bank
as 1:2013cv04754
Plaintiff:
VIP Engineering and Marketing Ltd
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 205 Removal of cases from State courts
Rosental v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
as 1:2012cv09421
Plaintiff:
Bernardo J. Rosental
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
TRE-C, S.A. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
as 1:2012cv09425
Plaintiff:
TRE-C, S.A.
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
de Uziel v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
as 1:2012cv09423
Plaintiff:
Sara Boltvinik de Uziel
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lyac Venture Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
as 1:2012cv09422
Plaintiff:
Lyac Venture Corp.
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Skyworth Products Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
as 1:2012cv09427
Plaintiff:
Skyworth Products Ltd.
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Optic Blue Limited v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
as 1:2012cv09426
Plaintiff:
Optic Blue Limited
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
