Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Sidbury v. Name Unknown et al
as 1:2018cv00866
Defendant:
Bell, Name Unknown and Wugo
Plaintiff:
Steven Sidbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estruch v. Stich et al
as 6:2018cv06502
Plaintiff:
Dennis Estruch
Defendant:
(unknown) Gordowski, Mary Does one through seven, Thomas Stich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dublino v. Thomas et al
as 6:2018cv06010
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Dublino
Defendant:
James Thomas, Scott Harvey, Winegarden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saeli v. WIVB-TV et al
as 6:2017cv06442
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
WIVB-TV, WNLO-YV, Nexstar Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saeli v. WGRZ-News Channel 2 et al
as 6:2017cv06441
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
WGRZ-News Channel 2, Tegena, Inc., The unknown CEO's of WGRZ & Tegna, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Tryon et al
as 6:2017cv06402
Plaintiff:
Nyran Dale Thompson
Defendant:
Todd Tryon, Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega-Rivera v. Chautauqua County, NY et al
as 6:2017cv06291
Petitioner:
Johnny Vega-Rivera and Jonathan Vega-Rivera
Defendant:
Sgt. Stuczynski, Deponceau, Officer Rizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Loretta E. Lynch, Micheal G. Dreher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. Reaves Jr. et al
as 6:2015cv06209
Plaintiff:
John A. McIntosh
Defendant:
Bing Reaves Jr., City of Rochester, New York, Rochester Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winters v. Office of the United States Attorney et al
as 6:2014cv06725
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Winters
Defendant:
Office of the United States Attorney, Eric H. Holder, Charles Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
