Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jones v. Reinbolt et al
as 6:2019cv06672
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Jane Doe, AUSA Melissa Marangola and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv06116
Respondent:
Judge J. Leon Holmes, Judge Kristine G. Baker, Judge James M. Moody, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Juste v. US Marshal Services et al
as 1:2017cv00720
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
US Marshal Services, Buffalo Federal Detention, US Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Reid et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
John B. Reid, US Dept of Justice and BIA Office of the Chief Immigration Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reva v. Officers of the US DHS
as 1:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Oleksiy Anatolievitch Reva
Defendant:
Officers of the US DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. One (name unknown) Named U.S. Magistrate Judge et al
as 6:2014cv06141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One (name unknown) Named U.S. Magistrate Judge, One or More Unknown Names U.S. Agents, Charles Schumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 1:2013cv01106
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Varel v. Holder et al
as 6:2012cv06342
Petitioner:
Teronio D. De Varel
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Janet Napolitano, Edward A. Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Esquer v. May et al
as 1:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Julio A. Esquer
Defendant:
Richard May and US Marshall Federal Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
