Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Deliser v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
Josue Deliser
Defendant:
J. Miller, Eric R. Nolette and Ronald G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urbanczyk v. Buffalo City Police Department, New York et al
as 1:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Chris Urbanczyk
Defendant:
Buffalo City Police Department, New York, Dustin Johnson, Lashondra Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. The People Of The State Of New York
as 1:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Woods
Defendant:
The People Of The State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wood v. USA
as 1:2010cv00646
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dawson Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Caldwell et al v. Goord et al
as 1:2009cv00945
Plaintiff:
Charlette Caldwell and Ricky Caldwell
Defendant:
Glenn S. Goord, Anthony Annucci, Leonard Mancini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatwright v. Ball et al
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
Maurice Boatwright, Maurice Boatwright and Maurice Boatwright
Defendant:
John E. Ball, Steven A. Blask, Dee F. Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 6:2009cv06457
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Crane et al
as 6:2009cv06393
Plaintiff:
Johnathan C. Nelson and Johnathan C. Nelson
Defendant:
Darren Crane, Patrick Jagodzinski, Brian Bly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez-Ka'Dawid v. Eagen et al
as 6:2008cv06530
Plaintiff:
Yahkima Gomez-Ka'Dawid
Defendant:
T. Eagen, K. Bellamy, Lester Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wood v. Alexander
as 6:2008cv06357
Petitioner:
Scott Wood
Respondent:
George B. Alexander
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
