Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
burns et al v. 1540924 Ontario et al
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Burns and Sandra J. Burns
Defendant:
1540924 Ontario Limited , Samuel Van Soelen , Fred Vanderheide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abbott et al v. Tonawanda Coke Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Abbott , Anthony Adimey , Dana Allen and others
Defendant:
Tonawanda Coke Corporation , James Donald Crane and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Felix v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00296
Plaintiff:
Debbie Felix
Defendant:
Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC , John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25, Jeffrey P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
De Jesus Jr. v. Mr. Ross et al
as 1:2011cv00196
Plaintiff:
Benito De Jesus Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Ross, Town of Hamburg, Town of Hamburg Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Payne et al
as 6:2011cv06059
Plaintiff:
Andrew James
Defendant:
Brandon L. Payne, Kyle R. Kennedy, Russell W. Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Burns et al
as 6:2010cv06595
Plaintiff:
Frederick Diaz
Defendant:
Robert Burns, John F. Moran, Frederick W. Kintzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Fischer et al
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, James T. Conway, S. Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
