Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Lugo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lugo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Soto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Jessica Soto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barron v. Komar
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Jessica Barron
Defendant:
Gail Komar d/b/a Gail's Tobaco and Gas Outlet and Gail Komar doing business as Gail's Tobaco and Gas Outlet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Van Iderstine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Jessica I. Van Iderstine
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06490
Plaintiff:
Jessica Morales
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
